Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days

16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 16.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (14.2%), Brisbane has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Brisbane has a value of 16.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Cancer

5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (6.3%), Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

84.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 84.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 84.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (82.1%), Brisbane has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(82.1%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Brisbane has a value of 84.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Colon Cancer Screening: Sigmoidoscopy Past 5 Years and FOBT Past 3 Years, Colonoscopy Past 10 Years, or FOBT Past Year

71.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 71.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (71.3%), Brisbane has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Brisbane has a value of 71.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

62.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 62.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 62.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,435 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (63.4%), Brisbane has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(63.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Brisbane has a value of 62.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

75.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 75.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 75.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,432 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (72.5%), Brisbane has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(72.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Brisbane has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Diabetes

8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,327 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,025 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (20.5%), Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(20.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.7%), Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Brisbane has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children with a Disability

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.9%), Brisbane has a value of 1.3%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.7%), Brisbane has a value of 1.3%.
CA Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Brisbane has a value of 1.3%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (3.6%), Brisbane has a value of 4.7%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Brisbane has a value of 4.7%.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Brisbane has a value of 4.7%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Disability

10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.7%), Brisbane has a value of 10.5%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Brisbane has a value of 10.5%.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Brisbane has a value of 10.5%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.7%), Brisbane has a value of 2.0%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.9%), Brisbane has a value of 2.0%.
CA Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Brisbane has a value of 2.0%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.1%), Brisbane has a value of 1.7%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Brisbane has a value of 1.7%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Brisbane has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with a Vision Difficulty

2.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (1.5%), Brisbane has a value of 2.1%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.1%), Brisbane has a value of 2.1%.
CA Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Brisbane has a value of 2.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (4.4%), Brisbane has a value of 4.1%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Brisbane has a value of 4.1%.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Brisbane has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

63.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 63.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 60.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 63.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (64.9%), Brisbane has a value of 63.3% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(64.9%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Brisbane has a value of 63.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults without Health Insurance

5.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (6.6%), Brisbane has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Brisbane has a value of 5.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Households with an Internet Subscription

96.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 96.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (94.6%), Brisbane has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (91.6%), Brisbane has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(91.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Brisbane has a value of 96.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

Current Value:
96.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 96.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,469 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 96.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,675 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (97.2%), Brisbane has a value of 96.5% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(97.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (95.9%), Brisbane has a value of 96.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Brisbane has a value of 96.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Persons with an Internet Subscription

97.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 97.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 87.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 97.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,859 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (95.6%), Brisbane has a value of 97.2% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(95.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (93.4%), Brisbane has a value of 97.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Brisbane has a value of 97.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Experienced a Stroke

2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.5%), Brisbane has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Brisbane has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

3.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (4.7%), Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
70.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 70.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 70.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (74.7%), Brisbane has a value of 70.7% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(74.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Brisbane has a value of 70.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Cholesterol Test History

88.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 88.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 88.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (88.0%), Brisbane has a value of 88.6% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(88.0%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Brisbane has a value of 88.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane High Blood Pressure Prevalence

25.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (27.4%), Brisbane has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(27.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Brisbane has a value of 25.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

33.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 33.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (35.4%), Brisbane has a value of 33.6% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(35.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Brisbane has a value of 33.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (13.8%), Brisbane has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Brisbane has a value of 15.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (11.7%), Brisbane has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Brisbane has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Current Value:
35.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 35.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 26.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,471 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 35.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (33.1%), Brisbane has a value of 35.4% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(33.1%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Brisbane has a value of 35.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Current Value:
40.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 40.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 40.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,400 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (38.9%), Brisbane has a value of 40.8% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(38.9%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Brisbane has a value of 40.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Disability

23.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (28.4%), Brisbane has a value of 23.1%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (33.5%), Brisbane has a value of 23.1%.
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Brisbane has a value of 23.1%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

10.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (11.2%), Brisbane has a value of 10.0%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.9%), Brisbane has a value of 10.0%.
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Brisbane has a value of 10.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

10.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.4%), Brisbane has a value of 10.4%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (9.5%), Brisbane has a value of 10.4%.
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Brisbane has a value of 10.4%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (4.5%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5%.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (14.4%), Brisbane has a value of 8.6%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (16.4%), Brisbane has a value of 8.6%.
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Brisbane has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

6.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,418 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (5.7%), Brisbane has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Brisbane has a value of 6.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Visited a Dentist

73.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 73.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 73.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (70.8%), Brisbane has a value of 73.4% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(70.8%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Brisbane has a value of 73.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Arthritis

17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 17.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (18.7%), Brisbane has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Brisbane has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Kidney Disease

2.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.7%), Brisbane has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Brisbane has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who are Sedentary

14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 14.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (23.7%), Brisbane has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with COPD

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with COPD

3.8%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (4.0%), Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Brisbane has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults with Current Asthma

8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.0%), Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Brisbane has a value of 8.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults who Smoke

8.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.1%), Brisbane has a value of 8.6% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Brisbane has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Adults Who Are Obese

22.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 22.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 22.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Brisbane has a value of 22.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Insufficient Sleep

28.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,438 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (28.6%), Brisbane has a value of 28.9% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(28.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Brisbane has a value of 28.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

8.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 8.1% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.5%), Brisbane has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Brisbane has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,472 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,528 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (12.5%), Brisbane has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Brisbane has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Average Household Size

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.80), Brisbane has a value of 2.50.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.80)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Brisbane has a value of 2.50.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Brisbane has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Foreign Born Persons

33.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (35.2%), Brisbane has a value of 33.2%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Brisbane has a value of 33.2%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Brisbane has a value of 33.2%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Veteran Population

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Veteran Population

3.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (3.4%), Brisbane has a value of 3.4%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Brisbane has a value of 3.4%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Brisbane has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children in Single-Parent Households

27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 27.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 27.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,568 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (15.3%), Brisbane has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Brisbane has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Brisbane has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 65+ Living Alone

29.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 29.4% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 29.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,328 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (20.4%), Brisbane has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(20.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Brisbane has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Brisbane has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mean Travel Time to Work

28.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,265 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (28.0), Brisbane has a value of 28.9 which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(28.0)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Brisbane has a value of 28.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Brisbane has a value of 28.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (7.4%), Brisbane has a value of 7.0% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Brisbane has a value of 7.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Brisbane has a value of 7.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers who Drive Alone to Work

61.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 61.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,454 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 61.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 85.8%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,625 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (59.0%), Brisbane has a value of 61.6% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(59.0%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Brisbane has a value of 61.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Brisbane has a value of 61.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Workers who Walk to Work

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (2.4%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

61.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 61.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.5%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,474 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 61.7% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,799 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (62.2%), Brisbane has a value of 61.7% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(62.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Brisbane has a value of 61.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Brisbane has a value of 61.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

62.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 46.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 62.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (64.7%), Brisbane has a value of 62.0% which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(64.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Brisbane has a value of 62.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Brisbane has a value of 62.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Households Receiving SNAP with Children

90.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (49.6%), Brisbane has a value of 90.4%.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Brisbane has a value of 90.4%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Brisbane has a value of 90.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
CA Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 1,470 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 28,912 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (0.7%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Homeownership

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Homeownership

60.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 60.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.7%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,501 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 60.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 62.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,990 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (55.4%), Brisbane has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(55.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Brisbane has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Brisbane has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Median Household Gross Rent

$2,638
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $2,638 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,597 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,072.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,102 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($2,805), Brisbane has a value of $2,638 which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($2,805)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Brisbane has a value of $2,638 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Brisbane has a value of $2,638 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

Current Value:
$777
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $777 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $656 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $833.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,179 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($975), Brisbane has a value of $777 which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($975)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Brisbane has a value of $777 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Brisbane has a value of $777 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$3,830
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $3,830 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,244 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,800.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,098 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($3,885), Brisbane has a value of $3,830 which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($3,885 in 2017-2021)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Brisbane has a value of $3,830 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Brisbane has a value of $3,830 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

Current Value:
54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 54.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,396 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (35.2%), Brisbane has a value of 54.3% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (37.4%), Brisbane has a value of 54.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2%), Brisbane has a value of 54.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Brisbane (54.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Overcrowded Households

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 6.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,480 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (7.3%), Brisbane has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Brisbane has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Brisbane has a value of 6.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:
28.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.9% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,360 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 28.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.1%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,241 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (48.4%), Brisbane has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(48.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Brisbane has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Brisbane has a value of 28.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Gender Pay Gap

$0.88
Cents on the dollar
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $0.88 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $0.72 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $0.59.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,099 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($0.81), Brisbane has a value of $0.88 which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($0.81)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($0.74), Brisbane has a value of $0.88 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($0.74)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.72), Brisbane has a value of $0.88 which is higher and better.
US Value
($0.72)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Income Inequality

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Income Inequality

0.560
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.560 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.422 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.463.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,453 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.560 which is in the worst 25% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.404 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.452.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,505 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (0.493), Brisbane has a value of 0.560 which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(0.493)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Brisbane has a value of 0.560 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Brisbane has a value of 0.560 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Median Household Income

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Median Household Income

$137,583
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $137,583 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $81,483 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $59,688.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,291 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $137,583 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $61,726 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,125.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,419 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($149,907), Brisbane has a value of $137,583 which is lower and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($149,907)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Brisbane has a value of $137,583 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Brisbane has a value of $137,583 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Per Capita Income

$101,760
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $101,760 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,615 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,434.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,448 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of $101,760 which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than $31,134 while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than $24,781.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,512 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value ($77,741), Brisbane has a value of $101,760 which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
($77,741)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Brisbane has a value of $101,760 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Brisbane has a value of $101,760 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Children Living Below Poverty Level

11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 11.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,362 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,556 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (6.4%), Brisbane has a value of 11.6% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Brisbane has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Brisbane has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (10.6%), Brisbane has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (22.5%), Brisbane has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Brisbane has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Families Living Below Poverty Level

5.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.4%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,457 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,635 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (3.9%), Brisbane has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(3.9%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Brisbane has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Brisbane has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,441 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 4.5% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,319 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (8.1%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Brisbane has a value of 4.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

87.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.0%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 87.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.5%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (85.3%), Brisbane has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(85.3%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Brisbane has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Brisbane has a value of 87.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 12.2% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.4% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (14.7%), Brisbane has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (28.0%), Brisbane has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (28.8%), Brisbane has a value of 12.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People Living Below Poverty Level

5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,481 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,869 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (6.4%), Brisbane has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Brisbane has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Brisbane has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

Census Place (City): Brisbane Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane Youth not in School or Working

0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
CA Census Places
(2017-2021)
The distribution is based on data from 1,258 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
U.S. Census Places
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 26,145 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (0.8%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Brisbane has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

53.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 53.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.3%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 53.9% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.5% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 11.3%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (52.9%), Brisbane has a value of 53.9% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Brisbane has a value of 53.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Brisbane has a value of 53.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:

Census Place (City): Brisbane People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

91.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 91.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.0% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.2%.
CA Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,482 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brisbane has a value of 91.8% which is in the best 50% of census places (cities). Census places (cities) in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while census places (cities) in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,880 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the San Mateo, CA County Value (90.6%), Brisbane has a value of 91.8% which is higher and better.
San Mateo, CA County Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the San Mateo County value.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Brisbane has a value of 91.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Brisbane has a value of 91.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brisbane value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.